Monday, September 19, 2016

Subjects Matter Chapter 6 Response

A part of this chapter that really caught my attention was hearing about Jeff James’s teaching style found in the section entitled Substituting for the Textbook (198-9). James has a very unconventional approach to his science curriculum: he teaches almost entirely without a textbook. He believes that textbooks are boring, unreliable, and irrelevant material to both his course and to his student’s life. Instead, James makes his own text in the form of a PowerPoint or print out, which contains only the essential, relevant information that his students need. In addition to this, James ties in several trade books, scientific magazines, and even scientific novels (i.e. Big Bang: A Short History of the Universe) to both engage and inform his students. The textbook is used on rare occasions in his classroom as a reference book or to steal some diagrams or pictures from.


James also made a very profound statement that really moved me; he says: “As the science expert in the room, I’ve got to ask, what are the ideas that are fundamental to science, things kids have got to understand so they can continue their study of science in the future, and be able to consider a career in the field” (199). I love that. To a class full of middle schoolers, you are actually the resident science expert. You’re like Bill Nye the Science Guy!

                

So instead of allowing some textbook—which may even be over our own heads—to be the expert in the room, we science teachers should take advantage of our role as "experts" and use our knowledge to more appropriately communicate our material. We know our subjects, and we should know how to teach it well. Our students will benefit greatly from our expertise and passion for our subject, and perhaps it will inspire them to pursue a career in science someday.

309

Emily 

3 comments:

  1. Emily, I completely agree with your statement on our roles as "experts" in a field. As the teacher, it is our job to explain all the concepts in our field in a way that our students can understand and comprehend them, without scaring or driving them away from that field. I was also very drawn to that same section of the reading, I believe being able to take the most vital parts from the textbook, and rewording them into something easier for the students to understand is a very smart move that I wish more teachers could do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wish I could give you a high five for the "expert" observations. For me, one of the many problems facing teachers is that they often don't perceive themselves as content experts. Science teachers are scientists. Math teachers are mathematicians. History teachers are historians. Embracing one's identity as a content expert can offer a feeling of confidence and excitement when it comes to instruction. Embrace it!

    ReplyDelete